Reduction of Polyneuropathy-Related Pain

Percentage of patients 18 years and older diagnosed with polyneuropathy whose pain score at 12 months (+/- 60 days) was improved from the index score.

Documentation of Seizure Frequency

Percentage of patients with epilepsy who had seizure frequency documented at each visit.

Bunion Outcome – Adult and Adolescent

Percentage of patients with a who have a hallux valgus (bunion) deformity causing pain that receive an intervention and have clinically significant reduction in pain as a result of that intervention.

Heel Pain Treatment Outcomes for Adults

Percentage of patients aged 18 and older with a diagnosis of heel pain who receive an intervention intended to treat the heel pain and experience a clinically significant decrease in heel pain.
Patients who have had at least two visits during the reporting period

Oncology: Patient-Reported Pain Improvement

Percentage of cancer patients currently receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy who report significant pain improvement (high to moderate, moderate to low, or high to low) within 30 days.

Oncology: Screening and Achieving Resolution or Improvement of Distress for Cancer Care

Percentage of patients 18 years and older with an active cancer diagnosis who are screened for distress AND if screen is positive, achieve resolution or improvement within 6 months for at least 1 of their concerns.

THERE ARE TWO SUBMISSION CRITERIA FOR THIS MEASURE:
1) Patients 18 years and older with an active cancer diagnosis who are screened for distress using a comprehensive, standardized tool which assesses physical, emotional, social, practical, and spiritual concerns.
AND
2) Patients 18 years and older with an active cancer diagnosis who screen positive for distress using a comprehensive, standardized screening tool and achieve resolution or improvement within 6 months for at least 1 of their concerns.

The measure contains two submission criteria which aim to identify patients who were screened for distress (Submission Criteria 1) and of those patients who screened positive for distress, did corresponding interventions following a positive distress screening lead to meaningful improvement or resolution within 6 months (Submission Criteria 2). By separating this measure into various submission criteria, the MIPS eligible clinician or practice will be able to better ascertain where gaps in performance exist and identify opportunities for improvement. For accountability reporting in the CMS MIPS program, the rate for Submission Criteria 2 is used for performance.

Patients Suffering From an Upper Extremity Injury who Improve Pain

Percentage of patients 18 years or older suffering from an upper extremity injury who achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, or like mapped measure during the performance year.

Additionally, a risk-adjusted MCID proportional difference determined by calculating the difference between the risk model predicted and observed MCID proportion will be reported for each PT/OT/MSK Provider/Group. The risk adjustment will be calculated using a logistic regression model using: baseline function score, baseline pain score, age, sex, payer, surgical status, and symptom duration (time from surgery or symptom onset to baseline physical therapy visit) as well as instrument tool used. These measures will serve as a PT/OT/MSK Provider performance measure at the eligible PT/OT/MSK Provider or group level.

This measure will include one rate:
1) The overall performance rate of non-surgical and surgical patients who achieve the MCID in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale like mapped measure.

Patients Suffering From a Back Injury who Improve Pain

Percentage of patients 18 years or older suffering from a back injury who achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, or like mapped measure during the performance year.

Additionally, a risk-adjusted MCID proportional difference determined by calculating the difference between the risk model predicted and observed MCID proportion will be reported for each PT/OT/MSK Provider/Group. The risk adjustment will be calculated using a logistic regression model using: baseline function score, baseline pain score, age, sex, payer, surgical status, and symptom duration (time from surgery or symptom onset to baseline physical therapy visit) as well as instrument tool used. These measures will serve as a PT/OT/MSK Provider performance measure at the eligible PT/OT/MSK Provider or group level.

This measure will include one rate:
1) The overall performance rate of non-surgical and surgical patients who achieve the MCID in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale like mapped measure.

Patients Suffering From a Lower Extremity Injury who Improve Pain

Percentage of patients 18 years or older suffering from a lower extremity injury who achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, or like mapped measure during the performance year.

Additionally, a risk-adjusted MCID proportional difference determined by calculating the difference between the risk model predicted and observed MCID proportion will be reported for each PT/OT/MSK Provider/Group. The risk adjustment will be calculated using a logistic regression model using: baseline function score, baseline pain score, age, sex, payer, surgical status, and symptom duration (time from surgery or symptom onset to baseline physical therapy visit) as well as instrument tool used. These measures will serve as a PT/OT/MSK Provider performance measure at the eligible PT/OT/MSK Provider or group level.

This measure will include one rate:
1) The overall performance rate of non-surgical and surgical patients who achieve the MCID in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale like mapped measure.

Patients Suffering From a Knee Injury who Improve Pain

Percentage of patients 18 years or older suffering from a knee injury who achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, or like mapped measure during the performance year.

Additionally, a risk-adjusted MCID proportional difference determined by calculating the difference between the risk model predicted and observed MCID proportion will be reported for each PT/OT/MSK Provider/Group. The risk adjustment will be calculated using a logistic regression model using: baseline function score, baseline pain score, age, sex, payer, surgical status, and symptom duration (time from surgery or symptom onset to baseline physical therapy visit) as well as instrument tool used. These measures will serve as a PT/OT/MSK Provider performance measure at the eligible PT/OT/MSK Provider or group level.

This measure will include one rate:
1) The overall performance rate of non-surgical and surgical patients who achieve the MCID in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale like mapped measure.